DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-01.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning): 61.6% more intelligence, 28.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1306.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 29.9 | +61.6% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 61.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $310.24 | $220.73 | −28.9% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 28.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.00s | 56.24s | +1306.0% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 1306.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 42.30 for $267.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.10 for $190.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill