DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) scores 8.9 points higher (45.1 vs 36.2) but costs 3.9× as much to run the benchmark ($445 vs $115; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) when you need intelligence above 36.2, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) when 36.2 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 36.2 | −19.7% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 19.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | $114.52 | −74.2% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 74.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.82s | 6.78s | −57.1% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 57.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): 19.7% less intelligence, 74.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 57.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/gpt-6-1-terra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/gpt-6-1-terra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill