DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) scores 19.1 points higher (45.1 vs 26.0) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($445 vs $231; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 26.0 | −42.4% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 42.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | $231.08 | −48.0% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 48.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.97s | 49.64s | +210.8% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 210.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): 42.4% less intelligence, 48.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 210.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill