DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 10.1% less intelligence, 53.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 249.6% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 22.2 | −10.1% Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 10.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.91 | $365.63 | +53.0% Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 53.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.72s | 9.51s | +249.6% Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 249.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.30 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gemini-3-5-flash-lite · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gemini-3-5-flash-lite?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill