DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 16.2% less intelligence, 38.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1941.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 20.7 | −16.2% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 16.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.91 | $331.24 | +38.6% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 38.6% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.61s | 53.29s | +1941.8% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 1941.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.20 / $1.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-5-4-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-5-4-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill