DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 46.6% more intelligence, 49.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 129.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 36.2 | +46.6% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 46.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $227.10 | $114.52 | −49.6% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 49.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.95s | 6.78s | +129.8% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 129.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-terra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-terra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill