DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Large 3
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Mistral Large 3 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) scores 15.4 points higher (24.7 vs 9.3) but costs 5.1× as much to run the benchmark ($239 vs $46.4; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Mistral Large 3 when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | Mistral Large 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 9.3 | −62.3% Mistral Large 3 is 62.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.91 | $46.41 | −80.6% Mistral Large 3 is 80.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.71s | 7.23s | +166.8% Mistral Large 3 is 166.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.50 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 62.3% less intelligence, 80.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 166.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Mistral Large 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)Mistral Large 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/mistral-large-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/mistral-large-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill