DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 8.1% more intelligence, 57.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 51.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 42.7 | +8.1% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 8.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $671.96 | $283.18 | −57.9% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 57.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.03s | 22.73s | +51.2% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 51.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.29 / $1.20 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill