DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek or Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) scores 8.2 points higher (32.6 vs 24.4) but costs 35× as much to run the benchmark ($4222 vs $121; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 24.4, and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) when 24.4 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.4 | 32.6 | +33.6% Gemini 3.5 Flash (Hig… is 33.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.20 | $4,222.12 | +3383.6% Gemini 3.5 Flash (Hig… is 35× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 16.63s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $1.50 / $9.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High): 33.6% more intelligence, 3383.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/gemini-3-5-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/gemini-3-5-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill