DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 18.7 points higher (34.8 vs 16.1) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $823; both premium class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 2.5 Pro.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 16.1 | −53.7% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 53.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $822.85 | −23.9% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 23.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.95s | 27.19s | +70.5% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 70.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $1.25 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 53.7% less intelligence, 23.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Gemini 2.5 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gemini-2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gemini-2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill