DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 9.5 points higher (34.8 vs 25.3) but costs 7.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $150; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when you need intelligence above 25.3, and Hy3 when 25.3 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 25.3 | −27.3% Hy3 is 27.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $149.61 | −86.2% Hy3 is 86.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.37s | 33.29s | +116.6% Hy3 is 116.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.14 / $0.56 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Hy3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 27.3% less intelligence, 86.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 116.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Hy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill