DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 20.3 points higher (55.1 vs 34.8) but costs 2.9× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $1081; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 55.1 | +58.3% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 58.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $3,117.31 | +188.3% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 2.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.37s | 42.64s | +177.4% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 177.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 58.3% more intelligence, 188.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 177.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Kimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill