DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 5.4 points higher (40.2 vs 34.8) but costs 2.9× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $1081; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Qwen3.8 Max when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 40.2 | +15.5% Qwen3.8 Max is 15.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $3,172.37 | +193.4% Qwen3.8 Max is 2.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.95s | 64.64s | +305.3% Qwen3.8 Max is 305.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 15.5% more intelligence, 193.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 305.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill