DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs GLM-5.3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)
GLM-5.3 (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): the same intelligence, 407.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 71.6% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | GLM-5.3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 34.3 | Even |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $1,012.50 | +407.2% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 5.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.94s | 30.79s | +71.6% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 71.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $1.40 / $4.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)GLM-5.3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/glm-5-3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/glm-5-3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill