Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 30.2 points higher (46.3 vs 16.1) but costs 4.7× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $823; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (High) when you need intelligence above 16.1, and Gemini 2.5 Pro when 16.1 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 46.3 | +187.6% Grok 4.7 (High) is 2.9× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $3,880.88 | +371.6% Grok 4.7 (High) is 4.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.94s | 26.80s | −4.1% Grok 4.7 (High) is 4.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 187.6% more intelligence, 371.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 4.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Gemini 2.5 ProGrok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill