Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Llama 4 Scout by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 9.6 points higher (16.1 vs 6.5) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($823 vs $73.6; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 2.5 Pro when you need intelligence above 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout when 6.5 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 6.5 | −59.6% Llama 4 Scout is 59.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $73.56 | −91.1% Llama 4 Scout is 91.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.19s | 5.00s | −81.6% Llama 4 Scout is 81.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.18 / $0.66 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.6% less intelligence, 91.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 81.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
Gemini 2.5 ProLlama 4 ScoutToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill