Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite scores 6.3 points higher (15.6 vs 9.3) but costs 3.5× as much to run the benchmark ($156 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 9.3 | −40.4% Llama 4 Maverick is 40.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $43.98 | −71.8% Llama 4 Maverick is 71.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.15s | 11.18s | +81.8% Llama 4 Maverick is 81.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 40.4% less intelligence, 71.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 81.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteLlama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill