Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 39.7% more intelligence, 60.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 785.7% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 21.8 | +39.7% MiMo-V2.5 is 39.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $61.93 | −60.3% MiMo-V2.5 is 60.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.09s | 53.94s | +785.7% MiMo-V2.5 is 785.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill