Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 18.6% less intelligence, 49.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 273.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 12.7 | −18.6% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 18.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $233.56 | +49.8% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 49.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.08s | 22.73s | +273.8% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 273.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteQwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill