Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GLM-5.2 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google or GLM-5.2 (Max) by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.2 (Max) scores 4.0 points higher (33.7 vs 29.7) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($2097 vs $1935; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick GLM-5.2 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GLM-5.2 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.7 | 33.7 | +13.5% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 13.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,935.39 | $2,097.29 | +8.4% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 8.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.21s | 29.25s | +20.8% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 20.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $1.40 / $4.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
GLM-5.2 (Max) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 13.5% more intelligence, 8.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 20.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GLM-5.2 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGLM-5.2 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/glm-5-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/glm-5-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill