Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) scores 23.7 points higher (32.6 vs 8.9) but costs 288× as much to run the benchmark ($4222 vs $14.7; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 8.9 | −72.7% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 72.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $14.68 | −99.7% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 99.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.65s | 57.75s | +246.8% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 246.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $0.02 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 72.7% less intelligence, 99.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 246.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/gemma-4-e4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/gemma-4-e4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill