Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) scores 6.6 points higher (32.6 vs 26.0) but costs 18× as much to run the benchmark ($4222 vs $231; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 26.0, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when 26.0 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 26.0 | −20.2% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 20.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $231.08 | −94.5% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 94.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.65s | 49.36s | +196.5% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 196.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 20.2% less intelligence, 94.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 196.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill