Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) scores 8.5 points higher (32.6 vs 24.1) but costs 8.4× as much to run the benchmark ($4222 vs $502; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 24.1, and Solar Mini 4 when 24.1 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 24.1 | −26.1% Solar Mini 4 is 26.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $502.02 | −88.1% Solar Mini 4 is 88.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.65s | 27.46s | +64.9% Solar Mini 4 is 64.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Solar Mini 4 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 26.1% less intelligence, 88.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 64.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Solar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill