Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) scores 14.6 points higher (39.8 vs 25.2) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1100 vs $428; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Plus.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.8 | 25.2 | −36.7% Qwen3.7 Plus is 36.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,100.06 | $427.73 | −61.1% Qwen3.7 Plus is 61.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 47.00s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium): 36.7% less intelligence, 61.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill