Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) by Google or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-03.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) scores 26.8 points higher (57.7 vs 30.9) but costs 2.7× as much to run the benchmark ($5903 vs $2169; both flagship class). Pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.7 (Low).
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 57.7 | 30.9 | −46.4% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 46.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,903.03 | $2,168.65 | −63.3% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 63.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.62s | 14.13s | +21.6% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 21.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium): 46.4% less intelligence, 63.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 21.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-medium/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-medium/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill