Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 28.5 points higher (59.4 vs 30.9) but costs 3.8× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $2169; both flagship class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when you need intelligence above 30.9, and Grok 4.7 (Low) when 30.9 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 59.4 | 30.9 | −48.0% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 48.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,239.69 | $2,168.65 | −73.7% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 73.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 105.19s | 11.88s | −88.7% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 88.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High): 48.0% less intelligence, 73.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 88.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill