Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Ministral 3 14B

Which is better for the money: Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.

Clear winner

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)On the open-weights frontier

Intelligence: 8.90
Total cost: $14.7

MistralMinistral 3 14BOff the frontier

Intelligence: 6.00
Total cost: $37.6

Verdict

Pick Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)

Ministral 3 14B vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): 32.6% less intelligence, 155.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.9% faster end-to-end.

Metric	Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)	Ministral 3 14B	Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)	8.9	6.0	−32.6% Ministral 3 14B is 32.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)	$14.68	$37.56	+155.9% Ministral 3 14B is 2.6× more expensive
End-to-end time (lower is better)	57.75s	6.97s	−87.9% Ministral 3 14B is 87.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)	$0.02 / $0.10	$0.20 / $0.20
Input modalities	Text, Image, Speech, Video	Text, Image

Open this matchup in the interactive picker Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats it Ministral 3 14B: what beats it

Today's Pareto frontier

Against the frontier

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Ministral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model

Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill