GLM-5.2 (Max) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.2 (Max) by Z AI or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 21.4 points higher (55.1 vs 33.7) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $2097; both flagship class). Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GLM-5.2 (Max).
| Metric | GLM-5.2 (Max) | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 55.1 | +63.5% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 63.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,097.29 | $3,117.31 | +48.6% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 48.6% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 30.10s | 42.64s | +41.7% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 41.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GLM-5.2 (Max): 63.5% more intelligence, 48.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 41.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.2 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GLM-5.2 (Max)Kimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill