GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GLM-5.3-Flash
Qwen3.7 Max vs GLM-5.3-Flash: 29.4% less intelligence, 645.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 57.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM-5.3-Flash | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 29.5 | −29.4% Qwen3.7 Max is 29.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $305.52 | $2,277.12 | +645.3% Qwen3.7 Max is 7.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 38.89s | 16.67s | −57.1% Qwen3.7 Max is 57.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.50 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
GLM-5.3-FlashQwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill