GLM-5.3-Flash vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GLM-5.3-Flash
Beam 1.0 vs GLM-5.3-Flash: 27.5% less intelligence, 4.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 79.6% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM-5.3-Flash | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 30.3 | −27.5% Beam 1.0 is 27.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $305.52 | $318.73 | +4.3% Beam 1.0 is 4.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 39.33s | 8.02s | −79.6% Beam 1.0 is 79.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.50 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GLM-5.3-FlashBeam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill