GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs MiniMax-M3
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI or MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3 scores 8.5 points higher (29.2 vs 20.7) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($538 vs $331; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick MiniMax-M3 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh).
| Metric | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | MiniMax-M3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 29.2 | +41.1% MiniMax-M3 is 41.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $331.24 | $537.98 | +62.4% MiniMax-M3 is 62.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 53.29s | 26.74s | −49.8% MiniMax-M3 is 49.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
MiniMax-M3 vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): 41.1% more intelligence, 62.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 49.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)MiniMax-M3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/minimax-m3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/minimax-m3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill