GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) scores 12.9 points higher (20.7 vs 7.8) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($331 vs $159; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Pro 3.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 7.8 | −62.3% Solar Pro 3 is 62.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $331.24 | $159.22 | −51.9% Solar Pro 3 is 51.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 53.29s | 18.94s | −64.5% Solar Pro 3 is 64.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): 62.3% less intelligence, 51.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 64.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill