GPT-5.5 (High) vs MiniMax-M3
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (High) by OpenAI or MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (High) scores 7.8 points higher (37.0 vs 29.2) but costs 6.3× as much to run the benchmark ($3411 vs $538; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (High) when you need intelligence above 29.2, and MiniMax-M3 when 29.2 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (High) | MiniMax-M3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.0 | 29.2 | −21.1% MiniMax-M3 is 21.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,410.76 | $537.98 | −84.2% MiniMax-M3 is 84.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.79s | 26.74s | +35.1% MiniMax-M3 is 35.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
MiniMax-M3 vs GPT-5.5 (High): 21.1% less intelligence, 84.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 35.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-5.5 (High)MiniMax-M3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/minimax-m3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/minimax-m3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill