GPT-5.5 (High) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (High) scores 11.8 points higher (37.0 vs 25.2) but costs 8.0× as much to run the benchmark ($3411 vs $428; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (High) when you need intelligence above 25.2, and Qwen3.7 Plus when 25.2 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (High) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.0 | 25.2 | −31.9% Qwen3.7 Plus is 31.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,410.76 | $427.73 | −87.5% Qwen3.7 Plus is 87.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.56s | 47.00s | +140.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 140.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-5.5 (High): 31.9% less intelligence, 87.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 140.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-5.5 (High)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill