GPT-5.5 (High) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 27B (Low) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (High) scores 10.8 points higher (37.0 vs 26.2) but costs 3.2× as much to run the benchmark ($3411 vs $1060; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (High) when you need intelligence above 26.2, and Qwen3.8 27B (Low) when 26.2 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (High) | Qwen3.8 27B (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.0 | 26.2 | −29.2% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 29.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,410.76 | $1,060.08 | −68.9% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 68.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 36.31s | 55.56s | +53.0% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 53.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Low) vs GPT-5.5 (High): 29.2% less intelligence, 68.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 53.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GPT-5.5 (High)Qwen3.8 27B (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/qwen3-8-27b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/qwen3-8-27b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill