GPT-5.5 (High) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs GPT-5.5 (High): 7.6% more intelligence, 89.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 155.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (High) | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.0 | 39.8 | +7.6% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 7.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,410.76 | $362.72 | −89.4% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 89.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.79s | 50.57s | +155.5% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 155.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.15 / $0.47 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-5.5 (High)Qwen3.8-Flash-NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill