GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 8.7 points higher (29.5 vs 20.8) but costs 7.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1965 vs $256; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Max when you need intelligence above 20.8, and GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) when 20.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.8 | 29.5 | +41.8% Qwen3.7 Max is 41.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $255.77 | $1,964.83 | +668.2% Qwen3.7 Max is 7.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.11s | 16.58s | +224.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 224.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning): 41.8% more intelligence, 668.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 224.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill