GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) scores 4.2 points higher (42.1 vs 37.9) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($250 vs $110; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.1 | 37.9 | −10.0% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 10.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.48 | $109.55 | −56.3% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 56.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.52s | 49.53s | +295.6% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 295.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low): 10.0% less intelligence, 56.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 295.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill