GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.3 (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Grok 4.3 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 26.1 points higher (51.0 vs 24.9) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($662 vs $363; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.3 (High).
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | Grok 4.3 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.0 | 24.9 | −51.2% Grok 4.3 (High) is 51.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $662.28 | $363.24 | −45.2% Grok 4.3 (High) is 45.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 86.31s | 24.88s | −71.2% Grok 4.3 (High) is 71.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.25 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.3 (High) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh): 51.2% less intelligence, 45.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 71.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Grok 4.3 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)Grok 4.3 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/grok-4-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/grok-4-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill