GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 6.5 points higher (42.7 vs 36.2) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $115; both mid-range class). Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6.1 Terra (Low).
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.2 | 42.7 | +18.0% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 18.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $114.52 | $283.18 | +147.3% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 2.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.78s | 22.27s | +228.5% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 228.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low): 18.0% more intelligence, 147.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 228.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill