GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning): 11.8% more intelligence, 55.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.5 | 34.1 | +11.8% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 11.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $213.33 | $95.73 | −55.1% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 55.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.72s | 7.89s | +2.2% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 2.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.20 for $190.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)Muse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill