GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) vs o3-mini (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or o3-mini (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) scores 34.4 points higher (45.4 vs 11.0) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($365 vs $349; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise o3-mini (High).
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) | o3-mini (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.4 | 11.0 | −75.8% o3-mini (High) is 75.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $364.95 | $349.19 | −4.3% o3-mini (High) is 4.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.82s | 19.71s | +4.7% o3-mini (High) is 4.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $1.10 / $4.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
o3-mini (High) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh): 75.8% less intelligence, 4.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 4.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- o3-mini (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)o3-mini (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/o3-mini-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/o3-mini-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill