GPT-6 Astra (Medium) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Medium) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Medium) scores 20.1 points higher (49.6 vs 29.5) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($2434 vs $2277; both flagship class). Pick GPT-6 Astra (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Max.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Medium) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.6 | 29.5 | −40.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 40.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,434.12 | $2,277.12 | −6.4% Qwen3.7 Max is 6.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.89s | 16.62s | +19.7% Qwen3.7 Max is 19.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-6 Astra (Medium): 40.5% less intelligence, 6.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 19.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
GPT-6 Astra (Medium)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill