GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh): 63.3% less intelligence, 249.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 20.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 12.7 | −63.3% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 63.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $66.81 | $233.56 | +249.6% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 3.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.33s | 21.63s | −20.9% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 20.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill