GPT-6 Luna (Max) vs Llama 4 Scout
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI or Llama 4 Scout by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 31.6 points higher (38.1 vs 6.5) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($122 vs $73.6; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6 Luna (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Llama 4 Scout.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Max) | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.1 | 6.5 | −82.9% Llama 4 Scout is 82.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $122.05 | $73.56 | −39.7% Llama 4 Scout is 39.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 82.02s | 5.16s | −93.7% Llama 4 Scout is 93.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.18 / $0.66 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Luna (Max): 82.9% less intelligence, 39.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 93.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
GPT-6 Luna (Max)Llama 4 ScoutToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill