GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) scores 3.3 points higher (28.5 vs 25.2) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($449 vs $428; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Plus.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.5 | 25.2 | −11.6% Qwen3.7 Plus is 11.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $449.37 | $427.73 | −4.8% Qwen3.7 Plus is 4.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.91s | 47.00s | +695.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 695.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning): 11.6% less intelligence, 4.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 695.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill