gpt-oss-120b (high) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: gpt-oss-120b (high) by OpenAI or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick gpt-oss-120b (high)
Trinity Large Thinking vs gpt-oss-120b (high): 11.4% less intelligence, 323.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 29.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | gpt-oss-120b (high) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.3 | 10.9 | −11.4% Trinity Large Thinking is 11.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $122.29 | $518.07 | +323.6% Trinity Large Thinking is 4.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.38s | 8.78s | −29.1% Trinity Large Thinking is 29.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.59 | $0.25 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- gpt-oss-120b (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 22.30 for $42.6.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
gpt-oss-120b (high)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill