Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Beam 1.0 scores 16.3 points higher (30.3 vs 14.0) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($319 vs $250; both mid-range class). Pick Beam 1.0 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.0 | 30.3 | +116.4% Beam 1.0 is 2.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.37 | $318.73 | +27.3% Beam 1.0 is 27.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.86s | 7.79s | +32.9% Beam 1.0 is 32.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning): 116.4% more intelligence, 27.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 32.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill