Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) scores 6.2 points higher (14.0 vs 7.8) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($250 vs $159; both mid-range class). Pick Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Pro 3.
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.0 | 7.8 | −44.3% Solar Pro 3 is 44.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.37 | $159.22 | −36.4% Solar Pro 3 is 36.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.93s | 18.88s | +218.4% Solar Pro 3 is 218.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning): 44.3% less intelligence, 36.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 218.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill