Grok 4.3 (High) vs Grok 4.6 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (High) by SpaceXAI or Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Low) scores 10.2 points higher (35.1 vs 24.9) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($614 vs $363; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Grok 4.6 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.3 (High).
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (High) | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.9 | 35.1 | +41.0% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 41.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $363.24 | $613.92 | +69.0% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 69.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.87s | 13.64s | −52.8% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 52.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (Low) vs Grok 4.3 (High): 41.0% more intelligence, 69.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 52.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Grok 4.3 (High)Grok 4.6 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3/grok-4-6-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3/grok-4-6-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill